
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>News &amp; Press</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/default.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[  Read about recent events, essential information and the latest community news.  ]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2026 07:16:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2017 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2017 California Attorneys for Criminal Justice</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://cacj.org/news/news_rss.asp?cat=14923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Davis Vanguard: Prosecutorial Misconduct a Felony in California</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470240</link>
<guid>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470240</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.davisvanguard.org/2017/01/justice-watch-prosecutorial-misconduct-felony-california/">Davis Vanguard: Prosecutorial Misconduct a Felony in California</a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2017 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sacramento debating felony status for prosecutorial misconduct</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470825</link>
<guid>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470825</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Last week, Ignacio Hernandez, CACJ’s long-time lobbyist, spoke on KPCC, a Southern California Public Radio station, on our prosecutorial misconduct sponsored bill AB 1909. This bill was authored by Assemblywoman Patty Lopez, and would amend Penal Code 141, creating a felony for prosecuting attorneys who knowingly and intentionally withhold exculpatory evidence.</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/2016/08/18/51379/sacramento-debating-felony-status-for-prosecutoria/"><span style="color: blue;">Listen here</span></a></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sacramento debating felony status for prosecutorial misconduct</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470824</link>
<guid>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470824</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Last week, Ignacio Hernandez, CACJ’s long-time lobbyist, spoke on KPCC, a Southern California Public Radio station, on our prosecutorial misconduct sponsored bill AB 1909. This bill was authored by Assemblywoman Patty Lopez, and would amend Penal Code 141, creating a felony for prosecuting attorneys who knowingly and intentionally withhold exculpatory evidence.</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/2016/08/18/51379/sacramento-debating-felony-status-for-prosecutoria/"><span style="color: blue;">Listen here</span></a></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prosecutorial misconduct and other legislative mistakes cost Californians millions</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470817</link>
<guid>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470817</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Prosecutorial misconduct led to the overturning of 86 convictions in California from 1989 to 2012. These, combined with other judicial mistakes, resulted in wrongful imprisonment of nearly 700 people over two decades. The total to incarcerate, and later settle lawsuits for these cases, cost the taxpayers over $220 million dollars.</span></p>
<p><span>CACJ is the leading organization demanding that prosecutors be held accountable for violations. In 2015 CACJ pushed for AB 672, otherwise known as Obie’s law, named for Obie Anthony who spent 17 years behind bars for a crime for which he was later exonerated. This bill, which was passed and was signed by the Governor, requires that CDCR provide transitional services, such as job training, housing assistance, and mental health services, to those wrongfully convicted.</span></p>
<p><span>CACJ also sponsored first-of-a-kind legislation to report prosecutors to the California State Bar for withholding evidence.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;"><span>Read more from the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-me-report-bad-convictions-cost-california-millions-20160310-story.html"><span style="color: blue;">LA Times</span></a></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;"><span class="f"> </span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>IN THE PRESS: CACJ’s Prosecutorial Bill Gains Attention</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470799</link>
<guid>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470799</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span> </span></b></p>
<p><span>In the past two days, CACJ’s sponsored bill, AB 1328, on prosecutorial misconduct, received some noteworthy press from both the Orange County Register (view <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/prosecutors-686481-law-evidence.html"><span style="color: blue;">here</span></a>) and Huffington Post (view <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/california-law-prosecutorial-misconduct_5615a45fe4b021e856d386a7"><span style="color: blue;">here</span></a>).</span></p>
<p><span>In the OC Register, one of the writers that has been closely following the Dekraai case, wrote a great piece on the bill.</span></p>
<p><span>Alex Kozinski, former chief judge of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, told The Huffington Post. "It seems to give a great deal of discretion to trial judges, so its effectiveness will depend on the degree to which those judges are willing to exercise that authority."</span></p>
<p><span>Erwin Chemerinski, Dean of Irvine School of Law and Constitutional Scholar, commented to the Huffpost that the law was a “good” development.</span></p>
<p><span>"The Constitution and professional ethics already require that prosecutors turn over exculpatory evidence," Chemerinsky said. "But violations are widespread. This provides additional sanctions for prosecutorial misconduct and hopefully an additional deterrent."</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California State Bar Commission Approves Expedited Consideration of New Ethical Rule for Prosecutors</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470802</link>
<guid>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470802</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span>At the request of CACJ, The Innocence Project, CPDA, and others, the California State Bar Rules Commission convened Friday, October 23rd, in San Francisco to consider the expedited adoption of an ethical rule for California prosecutors. Friday's vote was the first step in getting a final rule adopted in California.</span></p>
<p><span>CACJ asked for the rule to follow ABA Model Rule 3.8 which has been adopted in various forms by every other state in the country. The California District Attorneys Association (CDAA) opposed the proposed rule and sent several representatives to offer testimony.</span></p>
<p><span>CACJ had two individuals register support for the ethical rule and signed on to a joint letter with CPDA and others.</span></p>
<p><span>The vote was split, but ultimately a majority of the Commission Members approved the ethical rule. The rule will next be sent to the Board at their November 20<sup>th</sup> meeting for review, and then out for public comments for a 90-day period. The Commission also approved to expedite this rule, which will allow it to be given separate consideration by the CA Supreme Court, ahead of other rules that will be submitted by the Bar.</span></p>
<p><span>Former CACJ President Gerald Uelmen, Barry Scheck of the Innocence Project, and Michael Ogul of CPDA provided much of the testimony in support of the rule.</span></p>
<p><span>This victory continues CACJ's campaign against prosecutorial misconduct. A few weeks ago Governor Jerry Brown signed the CACJ sponsored AB 1328, which requires judges to report prosecutors who intentionally withhold evidence to the State Bar.</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title> Maintaining the Status Quo on Brady Violations is not a Sufficient Deterrent to Prevent a Growing N</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=503704</link>
<guid>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=503704</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"> <strong>Maintaining the Status Quo on <em>Brady</em> Violations is not a Sufficient Deterrent to Prevent a Growing National "Epidemic" of Prosecutorial Misconduct </strong> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> <strong>SACRAMENTO</strong> - The California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, a statewide association of criminal defense attorneys, is disappointed with Governor Jerry Brown's decision to veto Assembly Bill 885. </p>
<p>AB 885, CACJ sponsored bill, would have allowed a court, at its discretion, to read a jury instruction when a prosecutor intentionally or knowingly withheld evidence that may have prove the innocence of a defendant.</p>
<p>In Governor Brown's veto statement, he states that "prosectuorial misconduct should never be tolerated." We agree wholeheartedly. Governor Brown also writes, "under current law, judges have an array of remedies at their disposal if discovery violation comes to light during trial."</p>
<p> CACJ cannot sit back and rely on the status quo. It is clear that many judges do not regularly use whatever remedies the Governor referred to and these remedies are insufficient deterrents. We know prosecutors continue to strategically withhold evidence from the defense because <em>Brady </em>violations persist and innocent individuals are being wrongfully imprisoned in California. Unfortunately, prosecutors face little, if any, consequences. </p>
<p>Prosecutorial misconduct can happen to anyone. The possibility of one more person being wrongfully convicted, such as Obie Anthony, should have tipped the scales in favor of this moderate measure. Mr. Anthony was wrongfully convicted of murder and attempted robbery in 1995. Mr. Anthony was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole and spent 17 years in prison.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">CACJ will continue fighting to protect the innocent and ensure justice is served.</p>
September 29, 2014<br />]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:41:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Problem Could Torpedo Guilt Cold-Case Murder Trial</title>
<link>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470772</link>
<guid>https://cacj.org/news/news.asp?id=470772</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b><span>San Jose Mercury News </span></b></p>
<p><span>A pending case in Santa Clara County, where the DA withheld 10,000 pages of discovery until 2 weeks before jury trial on a homicide, and also failed to disclose that he was having an affair with the lead criminalist in the case who provided the key DNA results in a "cold hit" murder, is threatening to torpedo the trial of two brothers accused of a 25-year-old "cold case" murder.</span></p>
<p><span>The evidence issue comes as Gov. Jerry Brown considers whether to sign Assembly Bill 885, <i>sponsored by California Attorneys for Criminal Justice</i>, which would allow judges to tell a jury when a prosecutor has intentionally concealed potentially helpful evidence to the defense.</span></p>
<p><span>"Everybody that has ever tried cases," Barry Scheck said, "knows this (prosecutorial misconduct involving withheld evidence) is a problem."</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: disc;">
    <li><span><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_26593015/new-problem-could-torpedo-quilt-cold-case-murder"><span style="color: blue;">See the rest of the article here.</span></a></span></li>
</ul>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
